Inokim Light vs. Inokim Quick 4
Having relied on electric scooters as my primary mode of transportation around town for years, I've had the chance to try out a wide variety of models from different manufacturers. Two scooters that stand out for their lightweight yet powerful performance are the Inokim Light and the Quick 4. I've owned and used both over the last few years and want to share my experiences comparing these two excellent commuting and errand running scooters.
Performance
When it comes to pure speed and acceleration, the Quick 4's 600 watt motor clearly outperforms the Inokim Light's 350 watt motor. The Quick 4 can reach a top speed of 40 km/h, while the Light maxes out at 35 km/h. The Quick 4 has substantially more torque off the line, allowing it to get up to top speed very rapidly with the need for less kickoff assistance from the rider. The Light is no slouch however, with respectable acceleration that can still keep up with city traffic flows. For longer sustained speeds, the Quick 4 is the winner. In terms of range, the Quick 4 again beats out the Light, with an estimated max range of 70 km compared to 45 km. In real world riding, I can reliably get at least 50-55 km of range from my Quick 4 between charges, which covers the majority of my daily trips. The Light's smaller battery and range does occasionally have me hunting for a mid-day charging point if I'm covering longer distances. When it comes to balancing performance and battery range, the Quick 4 certainly wins out.
Ride Experience
Despite its power advantage, the Quick 4's ride experience is not quite as refined as the Inokim Light. At low to moderate speeds, the Light offers extremely smooth acceleration and braking, giving it a more refined feel. The larger air-filled tires absorb bumps exceptionally well, while the smooth throttle control and braking avoids jarring starts or stops. The Quick 4 has slightly harsher throttle and brake response, which can lead to a bit of jerkiness in stop-and-go traffic riding.
In terms of comfort, the Light is again the winner. Its wider handlebars provide excellent leverage when steering and crater small bumps with ease. The Quick 4 has narrower bars that can feel twitchier at high speeds. The Light also offers superior suspension and deck flex, making for a very comfortable ride quality even over poorly maintained roads. The Quick 4 transmits more road vibration through to the rider.
When it comes to high speed stability though, the Quick 4's larger 10 inch tires provide more confidence inspiring stability compared to the Light's 8 inch tires, which can feel slightly wobbly at their top speed limit. For a mix of ride refinement and stability, the Light gets my vote for most riding conditions.
Design & Build Quality
Both scooters feature excellent build quality, however, the Quick 4's heavier duty construction makes it the clear winner for durability. Its aircraft grade aluminum frame feels indestructible, capable of absorbing huge impacts and bumps without issue. The overbuilt stem, thick chassis, and large contact patch tires can stand up to serious urban riding over varied terrain.
By comparison, the Light favors a minimalist, lightweight design over ruggedness. While the materials and quality are excellent, it isn't meant for the truly brutal treatment that the Quick 4 can handle. The thin, lightweight handlebar stem in particular is vulnerable to bending or snapping if overloaded or dropped.
For those wanting a durable, heavy duty scooter, the Quick 4 is a tank. But the Light counters with easy portability thanks to its featherlight 14 kg weight. For urban living where carrying a scooter upstairs is necessary, the Light has a big advantage. It also looks more refined and modern compared to the industrial Quick 4.
Charging & Electricals
When it comes to charging and electrical systems, the Quick 4 again edges out the Light, but not by much. Its fast 7 hour maximum charge time allows for overnight full charges, while the Light's 5 hour charge time can require occasionally pulling an all-nighter to fully replenish the battery if depleted. Both feature fast charging capability to top up quickly while out and about.
The displays on both scooters provide battery level, speedometer, odometer, and headlight indicators. The Quick 4's display is larger and brighter for better visibility. In terms of lighting, the Quick 4's front headlight and rear brake light are much brighter than the Light's somewhat dim lighting. Electrical reliability has been flawless on both models too.
The Quick 4 justifies its name with faster charging capabilities and better lighting, although not by a massive margin over the Light. Both get top marks for dependable electricals that will keep you rolling day or night.
Value & Cost
When it comes to sticker price, the Quick 4 is the more expensive model, typically retailing around 4,950 AED compared to 2,699 AED for the Inokim Light. However, the Quick 4 justifies its higher cost with significantly more power, range, and heavy duty construction. Its outstanding performance and tank-like durability make it worth the extra investment for intense urban commuting.
The Light offers strong value as a lightweight, portable scooter that still offers pleasing performance for most urban riders. For university students or office commuters needing an easily carried scooter, the Light excels based on its price point.
The Quick 4 takes the crown for power, speed, range and durability - albeit at a premium price. But the refined ride experience and easy portability of the Inokim Light still impress, making it a great choice for lighter duty riding. Depending on your needs and budget, both are great electric scooters that are a blast to commute on. Riding my Quick 4 and Light have been joyful experiences - I'd happily recommend either to fellow urban riders looking for their next fun electric scooter.
Get your Inokim Quick4 and Light here
INOKIM LIGHT Electric Scooter – Scootup Scooters Trading llc
